Skip to main content

Just In

KenGen Risks Losing Olkaria Geothermal Wells Over Licence Error

KenGen Risks Losing Olkaria Wells Over 18-Year Licence Blunder Kenya Electricity Generating Company (KenGen) faces a serious legal and operational risk at Olkaria after an error in the coordinates of its geothermal licence left part of the company’s wells, steam infrastructure and other assets outside its legally recognised area. The licensing mistake, made nearly two decades ago, remains unresolved despite the Ministry of Energy and Petroleum acknowledging the problem in 2017.  The dispute has raised questions about the security of KenGen’s investments, the government’s management of geothermal resources and the potential consequences for Kenya’s electricity supply. Olkaria is the country’s most important geothermal centre and accounts for the overwhelming majority of Kenya’s installed geothermal generation capacity.  Licence Error Exposes Strategic Assets The problem dates back to September 19, 2008, when the Ministry of Energy and Petroleum issued KenGen a licence covering ...

Kaishan Targets 2 GW Kenya Geothermal Development Across Five Fields

Kaishan Targets 2 GW of Geothermal Development Across Kenya

Kenya's geothermal sector has opened a potentially significant new chapter after Kaishan Group and the Geothermal Development Company (GDC) signed a collaboration framework agreement covering five geothermal blocks in the East African Rift Valley.

Signed in Nairobi on September 14, 2026, the agreement establishes a framework for the two parties to explore potential joint development of Silali, Paka, Korosi, Baringo and Suswa. According to Kaishan, the five areas have potential to support approximately 2 GW of installed geothermal capacity.

The headline figure is substantial, but it is important to distinguish between resource potential and committed generation capacity. The framework agreement is non-binding. The parties will first conduct due diligence, assess the resources and negotiate development plans before potentially signing separate binding agreements for individual geothermal blocks.

The development could nevertheless become one of the most important private-sector geothermal opportunities in Kenya, particularly because Kaishan already has operating experience at the Menengai geothermal field and is developing a geothermal-powered green ammonia project with KenGen.

Kaishan and GDC Sign Framework for Five Geothermal Blocks

The September 14 agreement brings together two organisations with complementary roles in Kenya's geothermal industry.

GDC, a fully government-owned company, was established to develop geothermal steam fields and provide steam for electricity generation by KenGen and private investors.

Kaishan Group, meanwhile, has expanded its geothermal presence in Kenya through the development and operation of geothermal power plants at Menengai.

Under the new framework, the two organisations intend to investigate potential cooperation covering joint exploration, resource assessment, utilisation and possible development of geothermal resources in five areas.

The blocks are:

  • Silali
  • Paka
  • Korosi
  • Baringo
  • Suswa

Kaishan estimates that the combined resource potential could support approximately 2 GW of installed capacity.

The figure should be viewed as a development opportunity rather than a confirmed 2 GW construction programme.

The framework specifically provides for further due diligence and negotiations. If the parties agree on viable development plans, separate legally binding agreements would be signed for the individual geothermal blocks.

That process could ultimately determine how much capacity is actually developed.

Why the 2 GW Figure Matters

Two gigawatts would represent a major expansion of geothermal generation in Kenya.

Kenya has one of Africa's most developed geothermal industries, centred historically on Olkaria, while GDC has been developing additional resources in areas including Menengai and the Baringo-Silali-Paka region.

The country has also been actively trying to expand geothermal generation beyond its traditional core.

The opportunity is particularly relevant because geothermal power can provide electricity independently of weather conditions that affect hydropower and solar generation.

At Baringo-Silali-Paka, GDC has already reported successful geothermal exploration. In 2025, the Government Advertising Agency reported that GDC had struck viable steam at Silali, with the field expected to discharge 22 MW of steam. The broader Baringo-Silali-Paka project was targeting 300 MW in its first phase across Paka, Korosi and Silali.

That means the blocks included in the new Kaishan-GDC framework are not simply theoretical locations on a geothermal map. Several have already undergone substantial exploration and drilling.

Silali, Paka and Korosi: An Emerging Geothermal Cluster

Three of the areas covered by the agreement—Paka, Silali and Korosi—form part of the Baringo-Silali-Paka geothermal development area.

GDC has spent years exploring these resources.

In 2025, government reporting stated that GDC had already harnessed 75 MW of geothermal steam from the Baringo-Silali-Paka area and was targeting a 105 MW power plant at Paka by 2027. The same report said power producers would be competitively selected for power plant development at Baringo-Silali-Paka.

This creates an important potential pathway for private-sector participation.

Under Kenya's geothermal development model, GDC can take responsibility for resource development and steam-field activities while private investors develop power-generation infrastructure.

The Menengai project provides a practical example of that approach.

The new Kaishan framework could therefore potentially create another route through which private capital and technology are combined with geothermal resources developed by GDC.

Suswa Adds Another Major Geothermal Opportunity

The fifth area in the agreement is Suswa, located in the wider Rift Valley geothermal system.

GDC has already been working toward opening up the Suswa geothermal field. Government reporting in 2025 indicated that GDC had begun activities to open the field, while subsequent industry reporting has identified Suswa as part of the company's growing geothermal development portfolio.

Including Suswa in the Kaishan framework potentially expands the cooperation beyond the Baringo-Silali-Paka cluster.

It also demonstrates the scale of the opportunity being considered.

Instead of developing a single geothermal site, the agreement creates a framework for evaluating multiple geothermal resources across different locations.

For an international geothermal developer, that portfolio approach can be important because exploration outcomes vary from field to field.

Kaishan Already Has a Track Record at Menengai

The new agreement does not represent Kaishan's entry into Kenya's geothermal sector.

The company already has significant experience at Menengai, where it has developed two 35 MW geothermal power plants.

Kaishan reported in March 2026 that its KK01 geothermal power plant at Menengai had completed a 30-day stability test and was preparing for commercial operation. The plant has a net capacity of 35 MW and uses steam supplied by GDC.

Kaishan's involvement at Menengai has therefore given it direct experience with Kenya's geothermal resource-development and power-generation environment.

The company also became involved in the Menengai project through the acquisition of OrPower 22, which developed another 35 MW plant. The Kenyan PPP Directorate identifies OrPower 22 as being onboarded by Kaishan Group.

That existing footprint could be important when assessing the significance of the new GDC agreement.

Rather than beginning from zero, Kaishan is seeking to expand from existing Kenyan geothermal operations into a much larger portfolio.

From Geothermal Electricity to Green Hydrogen and Ammonia

Perhaps the most interesting part of the new framework is that it goes beyond conventional geothermal power generation.

The agreement also identifies potential cooperation in green hydrogen and green ammonia production.

Kaishan and GDC specifically envisage using surplus electricity during off-peak periods to produce green hydrogen and ammonia. The stated objectives include helping balance electricity supply and demand and potentially contributing to lower electricity prices.

This represents a different way of thinking about geothermal power.

Instead of treating electricity generation as the only product of a geothermal field, excess or strategically available electricity could potentially become an input into industrial production.

Green hydrogen can be used as a feedstock for ammonia production, while green ammonia can serve agricultural, industrial and potentially energy-related markets.

For Kenya, the connection with fertilizer production is particularly relevant.

Kaishan Is Already Building a Geothermal-Powered Fertilizer Project

The new GDC agreement builds on Kaishan's separate partnership with KenGen at Olkaria.

In November 2025, KenGen announced an agreement with Kaishan's Kenyan subsidiary for a geothermal-powered green fertilizer facility.

Under that agreement, Kaishan Terra Green Ammonia Limited is expected to construct and operate the facility using 165 MW of geothermal energy supplied by KenGen over 30 years. KenGen said the plant is expected to produce approximately 200,000–300,000 tonnes of green fertilizer annually.

The project illustrates why geothermal electricity could become more than a source of power for Kenya.

It can also serve as an industrial input.

Geothermal electricity can potentially power electrolysis and other industrial processes without depending directly on variable solar or wind generation.

Kaishan itself has described its broader vision as combining geothermal resources with green power, green hydrogen, green ammonia and related products.

The Concept of Using Off-Peak Geothermal Power

The proposed use of surplus electricity is particularly interesting from a grid-management perspective.

Geothermal plants are generally suited to providing stable generation, but electricity demand varies throughout the day.

If additional geothermal capacity is developed, there may be periods when available generation exceeds immediate demand or when electricity can be allocated to flexible industrial loads.

Producing hydrogen and ammonia during such periods could create another use for electricity.

The Kaishan-GDC framework explicitly identifies this concept as part of the proposed cooperation.

In principle, this creates a potential chain:

Geothermal resource → geothermal power → surplus/off-peak electricity → hydrogen → ammonia → fertilizer and other industrial products

Such integration could increase the range of economic uses associated with geothermal resources.

However, the commercial viability would depend on electricity costs, electrolyser utilisation, ammonia production economics, water availability, infrastructure, financing and market prices.

The Agreement Is Not Yet a 2 GW Construction Deal

This is the most important qualification surrounding the announcement.

The headline 2 GW should not be interpreted as meaning Kaishan has committed to immediately build 2 GW of geothermal power plants.

The September framework agreement is explicitly non-binding.

According to Kaishan, the immediate next steps involve due diligence and discussions covering joint exploration, assessment, utilisation and potential development. Binding agreements would subsequently be negotiated for individual geothermal blocks based on mutually agreed development plans.

This means several stages remain before the full potential could translate into actual installed capacity.

Those stages could include:

  1. Geological and geophysical assessment.
  2. Review of existing exploration wells.
  3. Additional drilling.
  4. Reservoir modelling.
  5. Steam-resource assessment.
  6. Power-plant feasibility studies.
  7. Environmental and social assessments.
  8. Transmission planning.
  9. Financing.
  10. Negotiation of binding project agreements.
  11. Construction.
  12. Commissioning.

The eventual capacity could therefore be different from the headline 2 GW potential.

Kenya's Private Geothermal Model Could Benefit

The agreement could nevertheless have wider implications for Kenya's geothermal development model.

GDC's role has traditionally focused heavily on resource development and steam-field management, while private investors can participate in power generation.

Menengai is an example of this approach.

ThinkGeoEnergy notes that the Menengai model involves GDC undertaking geothermal drilling and steam-field management while private partners develop and operate power plants.

Kaishan's expanded involvement could potentially provide another demonstration of how this structure can attract private investment into geothermal fields outside Olkaria.

The model is particularly relevant because drilling and resource development carry substantial subsurface risk.

An investor that can combine geothermal technology, financing capacity, project development experience and long-term operations could potentially participate across multiple stages of the value chain.

What the Deal Could Mean for Kenya's Geothermal Pipeline

Kenya has significant geothermal potential, but converting geological resources into operating power plants requires years of exploration, drilling, testing, infrastructure development and financing.

The new agreement potentially connects five major geothermal areas with an international developer that already has operational experience in Kenya.

That could accelerate discussions around projects that have previously been progressing through separate stages of exploration.

It could also create competition for geothermal development opportunities, potentially bringing additional capital and technical expertise into the sector.

But the ultimate impact will depend on whether the framework advances into binding project agreements.

The next major signal will therefore not simply be another announcement.

It will be evidence of resource assessments, development plans, financing commitments and binding agreements for individual blocks.

A New Geothermal-Industrial Model for Kenya?

The most significant element of the agreement may ultimately be its combination of geothermal electricity and industrial production.

Kenya has already demonstrated that geothermal energy can support large-scale electricity generation.

The Kaishan-KenGen fertilizer project is taking the next step by connecting geothermal power to industrial manufacturing.

The new GDC framework could potentially extend that concept into additional geothermal regions.

If geothermal power from new fields can be combined with hydrogen and ammonia production, Kenya could potentially develop a broader geothermal-powered industrial ecosystem.

Such a model would move geothermal energy beyond the traditional objective of supplying electricity to the grid.

The resource could become a platform for:

  • Electricity generation
  • Green hydrogen
  • Green ammonia
  • Fertilizer production
  • Industrial heat
  • Potential future synthetic fuels
  • Other electricity-intensive industries

The feasibility of each application would have to be established independently, but the framework shows that the discussion is already moving in that direction.

What Happens Next?

The immediate next phase is expected to focus on due diligence and resource assessment.

For each geothermal block, the parties will need to determine the quality and scale of the resource, development requirements and commercial potential.

Existing drilling data will be particularly important in areas such as Paka, Korosi, Silali and Baringo, while Suswa may require further exploration as development progresses.

The results will then inform decisions about the scale, configuration and economics of potential power projects.

If viable development plans are agreed, the parties can move toward legally binding agreements for individual blocks.

That is when the headline 2 GW opportunity could begin to translate into specific projects.

Kenya's Geothermal Story Is Entering Another Phase

The Kaishan-GDC framework is significant because it combines several developments already taking place within Kenya's geothermal industry.

GDC is expanding exploration beyond Olkaria.

Private developers are participating in geothermal power generation.

Kaishan has established an operating footprint at Menengai.

KenGen and Kaishan are pursuing geothermal-powered fertilizer production.

And the latest framework introduces the possibility of linking future geothermal generation with hydrogen and ammonia production.

The 2 GW figure remains potential capacity, not committed capacity. That distinction will be critical as the projects move forward.

But the underlying opportunity is substantial.

Five geothermal blocks—Silali, Paka, Korosi, Baringo and Suswa—are now covered by a framework that could bring together Kenya's geothermal resource-development expertise and Kaishan's international project-development capabilities.

If the subsequent technical and commercial assessments support development, the agreement could become a foundation for a much larger geothermal portfolio.

For now, the next chapter begins with due diligence.

Kenya has the resource potential. Kaishan has entered the framework. The question now is how much of the potential 2 GW can ultimately be converted into operating geothermal capacity—and how much additional value can be created from the electricity beyond the grid.


 https://lnkd.in/p/gk6UyrZy

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jicarilla Apache Geothermal Study Wins $2.5 Million Grant

Jicarilla Apache Nation Launches $2.5 Million Geothermal Feasibility Study The Jicarilla Apache Nation in northern New Mexico has launched a major investigation into its geothermal energy potential after receiving a $2.5 million grant from the State of New Mexico. The funding will support a detailed feasibility study examining whether underground heat resources on tribal lands could be developed for electricity generation, direct heating, or other energy applications. The initiative represents an important step in the Nation’s efforts to understand and diversify its energy resources. Although the Jicarilla Apache Nation has not yet committed to building a geothermal facility, the study could provide the geological, technical, and economic information required for future investment decisions. The project is particularly significant because the Nation already has extensive experience with subsurface exploration through its oil and gas activities. Existing geological records, drilling inf...

Ijen vs Zanskar: Blind Geothermal Energy Discovery and Development

Ijen’s Blind Geothermal System vs. Zanskar’s AI-Discovered Resources: Two Models for Finding Hidden Heat The geothermal industry is entering a new phase in which the most valuable resources may no longer be the fields marked by obvious hot springs, geysers, fumaroles, or steaming ground. Increasingly, developers are targeting “blind” or hidden geothermal systems,reservoirs that lack clear surface expressions but can still contain the temperature, permeability, and fluid needed for commercial power generation. Two examples illustrate how different parts of the industry are approaching this challenge. In Indonesia, the Blawan-Ijen geothermal field in East Java was developed through geological interpretation, magnetotelluric imaging, conceptual modelling, and drilling. The project is now operating commercially, with its first phase delivering approximately 35 MW to the Java grid under a 30-year power purchase agreement.  In the United States, Zanskar Geothermal & Minerals is using...

Vercana Electric Rig Advances Geothermal Brine Lithium Extraction Economics

Electric-Rig Direct Lithium Extraction From Geothermal Brine: The Economics of Vercana Versus Ormat Vulcan Energy Resources is pursuing an integrated model that combines geothermal drilling, direct lithium extraction, renewable electricity and industrial heat. Through its Vercana subsidiary, the company is also using electric drilling equipment designed to support the development of its Lionheart project in Germany’s Upper Rhine Valley. The approach differs from the conventional geothermal model represented by Ormat Technologies, whose core business remains geothermal power generation, equipment, project development and energy storage rather than commercial lithium recovery from geothermal brine.  The economic question is broader than whether an electric drilling rig costs less to operate than a diesel rig. The more important issue is whether electric drilling, geothermal energy and direct lithium extraction can create a more valuable integrated project than a conventional geotherm...

Western Geothermal Power Transmission Roadmap Toward 2030

Geothermal Power in the Western United States: A Transmission and Planning Roadmap to 2030 Introduction The Western United States is approaching a decisive period for geothermal power. Electricity demand is rising because of data centers, industrial electrification, population growth, electric vehicles and the replacement of retiring fossil-fuel generation. At the same time, utilities are under growing pressure to add clean resources that can operate reliably when solar and wind output declines. Geothermal power is well positioned to fill this role. Unlike weather-dependent generation, geothermal plants can provide firm electricity for long periods, support grid reliability and reduce the amount of storage required in deeply decarbonized power systems. However, the industry’s expansion will depend on more than subsurface heat and drilling technology. By 2030, transmission access, resource planning, project finance, permitting and utility procurement will determine whether geothermal be...

Billionaire Families Bet on Advanced Geothermal Energy Investments

Billionaire Geothermal Families Bet on Geothermal Billionaire families and private investment offices are placing increasingly large bets on geothermal energy, especially on technologies designed to make the resource available in more locations. Their investments are helping finance enhanced geothermal systems, advanced drilling, closed-loop designs, and other approaches that could transform geothermal from a regionally concentrated power source into a globally scalable clean-energy industry. The investment surge reflects a broader change in the energy market. Electricity demand is rising because of artificial intelligence, data centers, industrial electrification, electric vehicles, and the expansion of digital infrastructure. At the same time, utilities and large corporations need power that is reliable around the clock. Solar and wind remain essential to the clean-energy transition, but their output varies with weather and time of day. Geothermal could complement these technologies ...

Next-Gen Geothermal Funding 2026: VCs, Banks, Government Capital

Who Is Really Funding Next-Gen Geothermal in 2026? Next-generation geothermal has moved beyond laboratory research into a capital-intensive commercialization phase. In 2026, the most important financing is no longer coming from one investor category: venture capital funds are financing drilling, subsurface modelling and hardware; strategic energy companies are providing equipment, project access and market credibility; banks are beginning to lend against contracted projects; and governments are absorbing exploration and first-of-a-kind technology risk. The strongest financing activity is concentrated in the United States and Canada, but Europe is becoming increasingly important through Germany-based deployment, European Union grants, UK innovation support, and strategic participation from European energy companies. The central investment question is changing from “Can this technology work?” to “Can the developer deliver repeatable, financeable projects at commercial cost?” The 2026 fun...

Global Geothermal Investment 2026: 15 High-Growth Markets

Global Geothermal Investment 2026: 15 Markets Where Developers Should Look Next Geothermal energy is entering its most investable decade yet, with developers, drilling contractors, turbine suppliers and private capital providers scanning a widening map of opportunities beyond the traditional “big five” producers.  This article profiles 15 markets where project pipelines, policy signals, resource quality and technology readiness converge to create compelling entry points in 2026 and beyond.  Why 2026 Is a Turning Point for Geothermal Capital Global geothermal investment is accelerating as governments seek firm, low‑carbon baseload to back up variable wind and solar, while advanced drilling and subsurface engineering lower costs and expand the resource base. Market analysts project the geothermal energy market to reach roughly USD 13.56 billion by 2030, up from about USD 9.81 billion in 2025, implying sustained double‑digit growth in development spend. Capital is flowing not onl...

Alberta Geothermal Startup Phase Secures Funding for High-Temperature Drilling Sensors

Alberta’s Phase Targets a Critical Geothermal Drilling Barrier With High-Temperature Sensors Alberta is using its deep oil-and-gas expertise to pursue a new opportunity beneath the surface: geothermal energy. Among the companies receiving support through Emissions Reduction Alberta’s Drilling Technology Challenge is Edmonton-based Phase Advanced Sensor Systems Corp., which is developing a high-temperature downhole pressure sensor for enhanced geothermal systems. The project addresses a problem that could determine whether deep geothermal energy becomes commercially viable: operators need reliable, accurate information from wells exposed to extreme heat and pressure. Phase plans to demonstrate a sensor capable of operating at temperatures above 200°C, with testing planned at 200°C, 250°C and 275°C.  The project has a total value of approximately C$1.57 million, including C$420,000 in ERA funding, according to Alberta’s project information.  Dealroom reported the award as approx...

Unlocking Impermeable Geothermal Reservoirs: Hydraulic Stimulation, Menengai and Olkaria

Unlocking the Impermeable Reservoir: Lessons from a 30-Year Reservoir Engineer An Alphaxioms interview with Richard Joseph Holt, Principal Consultant in Reservoir Engineering at RESPEC . Context: Menengai East and Olkaria Central. Every geothermal developer knows the moment.  The rig is gone and the money is spent. The well is drilled to depth, the temperature is there, and then the well will not flow. The heat is real, but the connection between the well and the reservoir is not. Wells like this sit at the centre of one of the most important questions in geothermal development: what do you do with a tight reservoir? Walk away and drill again, or find a way to unlock what is already there? To explore the question, Alphaxioms spoke with Richard Joseph Holt, Principal Consultant in Reservoir Engineering at RESPEC . Richard brings 30 years of global experience in geothermal energy.  We framed our questions around two settings, Menengai East and Olkaria Central, and asked him how ...

Menengai Geothermal Project Delays Expose Kenya’s Broken Steam Supply Model

Menengai’s Broken Promise: How Kenya’s Geothermal Model Lost the Steam Thematic image of the Olkaria Geothermal Field  Kenya’s Menengai geothermal project was sold as a model of modern public-private partnership. The state would carry the difficult and expensive burden of geothermal exploration and drilling. Private power producers would then build, own and operate power plants. Geothermal Development Company would supply the steam; the independent power producers would convert it into electricity; Kenya Power would buy the output. On paper, the arrangement was elegant. In practice, Menengai has exposed a far more uncomfortable reality: Kenya’s public steam-supply model is not delivering the certainty it promised. Menengai Phase I was designed to produce 105 megawatts from three 35 MW plants. GDC’s own project page says the three plants were awarded to Globeleq Menengai Geothermal, Sosian Menengai Geothermal Power and OrPower Twenty Two under a build-own-operate structure. Yet the ...