KenGen Risks Losing Olkaria Wells Over 18-Year Licence Blunder Kenya Electricity Generating Company (KenGen) faces a serious legal and operational risk at Olkaria after an error in the coordinates of its geothermal licence left part of the company’s wells, steam infrastructure and other assets outside its legally recognised area. The licensing mistake, made nearly two decades ago, remains unresolved despite the Ministry of Energy and Petroleum acknowledging the problem in 2017. The dispute has raised questions about the security of KenGen’s investments, the government’s management of geothermal resources and the potential consequences for Kenya’s electricity supply. Olkaria is the country’s most important geothermal centre and accounts for the overwhelming majority of Kenya’s installed geothermal generation capacity. Licence Error Exposes Strategic Assets The problem dates back to September 19, 2008, when the Ministry of Energy and Petroleum issued KenGen a licence covering ...
Colorado Opens 6,597 Acres for Geothermal Development: Why the State’s New RFP Could Reshape America’s Clean Energy Map
Image: A map which depicts the land area
Colorado has taken a notable step toward becoming a serious geothermal market. In July 2026, the Colorado State Board of Land Commissioners issued a Request for Proposals inviting qualified developers to explore, finance, permit, construct, and operate geothermal energy projects on state trust land across five counties.
This is more than a routine land notice. By asking for complete development teams rather than simple speculative leaseholders, Colorado is signaling that it wants real projects, real timelines, and real electricity generation from its geothermal acreage.
A different kind of geothermal RFP
Most land offerings in the energy sector focus on access rights first and development later. Colorado’s geothermal RFP is broader, requiring bidders to show they can move a project from resource exploration through financing, permitting, engineering, construction, and long-term operation.
That approach matters because geothermal projects are expensive to prove but valuable once operating. If the state can attract experienced developers with strong balance sheets and drilling expertise, it could reduce some of the biggest barriers that have historically slowed geothermal growth in new markets.
The RFP is also notable for the way it frames value. Instead of treating geothermal as a passive mineral lease, Colorado is looking for development plans that consider community engagement, water use, development footprint, and surface impacts alongside financial return.
Where the land is located
The offering covers 11 vetted parcels totaling about 6,597 acres across Alamosa, Rio Grande, Saguache, Las Animas, and La Plata counties.
That geography is strategically important. Several of the counties sit in or near the Rio Grande Rift, a geologic setting associated with elevated heat flow, faulting, and conditions that can support both conventional geothermal systems and enhanced geothermal systems.
Among the counties, the San Luis Valley stands out because of its long history of geothermal interest and its proximity to existing transmission infrastructure. For developers, that combination of heat potential and grid access can make the difference between a promising resource and a financeable project.
Geothermal has often been discussed as a promising but underused clean energy source. Colorado’s move suggests that the industry may be entering a new phase, helped by better drilling methods, improved subsurface modeling, and stronger demand for firm power.
One reason the timing is favorable is technology. Techniques borrowed from oil and gas, including advanced drilling and stimulation methods, have improved the economics of geothermal exploration and may expand the number of places where geothermal development is viable.
Another reason is demand. As electrification grows and load from data centers, transport, and industry rises, utilities and policymakers are placing more value on power sources that can run continuously rather than only when the wind blows or the sun shines.
Colorado does not have the volcanic geothermal profile of places like Iceland or parts of Indonesia. Its opportunity lies in tectonics. The Rio Grande Rift creates a structural environment where heat can be closer to the surface and fault systems can provide pathways for fluid movement.
That matters for geothermal because heat alone is not enough. A viable project also needs a way to move water through hot rock and bring the heat back to the surface efficiently.
For enhanced geothermal systems, that geology is especially attractive. EGS projects aim to engineer permeability where nature has not provided enough of it, opening the door to geothermal production in places that would once have been dismissed as marginal.
How developers will be judged
Colorado is not simply asking who wants the land. It is evaluating who can actually deliver a project. According to the state’s materials, proposals will be judged on financial strength, project experience, access to financing, timeline, footprint, surface impacts, community engagement, and water planning.
That selection framework is important because geothermal development is capital intensive. A company may be technically capable but still fail to secure finance, while another may have capital but lack the drilling and subsurface experience needed to prove a resource.
The structure of the RFP suggests Colorado wants bidders that can solve both problems at once. In other words, the state appears to prefer development teams that can do the geology, the engineering, the permitting, and the money raising in one package.
What this could mean for investors
For investors, Colorado’s RFP is interesting because it creates a clearer pathway from public land access to potential generation assets. That reduces some of the uncertainty that often surrounds early-stage geothermal prospects.
It also helps that the parcels are in geothermally prospective areas and in some cases near transmission infrastructure. Those two factors can improve the odds that a project, if successful, can move from drilling to delivery without facing avoidable grid bottlenecks.
At the same time, the risk profile remains high. Geothermal is still one of the more capital-intensive renewable technologies, and exploration wells can cost millions before anyone knows whether a site is truly commercial.
Potential winners and partnerships
The RFP has not yet produced a public bidder list, but the kind of firms likely to compete are easy to imagine. Developers with geothermal track records, drilling specialists, subsurface technology companies, and energy infrastructure financiers are all plausible participants.
A partnership model may be especially common. Geothermal projects often require a mix of resource expertise, drilling capability, engineering know-how, and project finance, which means single companies may prefer to team up rather than go it alone.
That is particularly true in an emerging market like Colorado, where technical success will depend not only on identifying hot rock but also on proving that the resource can support long-term commercial operation.
If the RFP leads to successful projects, the economic benefits could extend well beyond power generation. Geothermal development creates demand for geologists, drilling crews, engineers, environmental specialists, construction workers, and plant operators.
Because geothermal plants can run continuously, the jobs linked to operation and maintenance may be more durable than many short-term construction roles. That gives the technology a stronger local economic narrative than many people associate with renewables.
There is also a public finance angle. Since these are state trust lands, successful development could generate long-term revenue for the trusts that support Colorado’s public institutions.
The challenges ahead
Even with strong policy momentum, geothermal is not easy to scale. Exploration risk remains the biggest hurdle, because deep drilling is costly and there is no guarantee that the first well will confirm a commercial reservoir.
Permitting and environmental review can also slow projects, even though geothermal’s surface footprint is usually smaller than that of many other energy sources. Developers still need to manage water use, land disturbance, wildlife concerns, and community expectations.
Transmission is another issue. Some of the best resources may still be located farther from major grid infrastructure than developers would like, which can add cost and delay unless utilities and policymakers plan ahead.
Why this RFP is bigger than Colorado
Colorado’s move may matter beyond the state itself because it reflects a broader policy shift. Rather than waiting for developers to identify every opportunity, the state is actively using its land portfolio to invite geothermal deployment.
That model could become more common in the western United States, where public lands, favorable geology, and rising demand for clean firm power intersect. If Colorado’s process works, other states may follow with their own competitive geothermal solicitations.
The larger industry implication is clear: geothermal is being treated less like a niche resource and more like an infrastructure class that can help support grid reliability, decarbonization, and economic development at the same time.
What happens next
The proposal deadline is September 20, 2026, after which the State Land Board will review submissions and evaluate which teams offer the best combination of technical capability, financial strength, and long-term value.
If the process goes well, successful bidders could move into lease negotiations and then into exploration work, including geophysical surveys and drilling plans.
That next phase will determine whether Colorado’s geothermal ambitions stay on paper or turn into operating generation assets. For now, the RFP is best understood as a significant opening move in what could become one of the most closely watched geothermal developments in the United States.
Why readers should care
Colorado’s geothermal RFP is not just a land opportunity. It is a test case for how states can accelerate clean energy by pairing public land with competitive development and modern geothermal technology.
If the chosen projects succeed, the state could become a template for geothermal expansion in other resource-rich regions. If they struggle, the results will still offer important lessons about where geothermal is ready to scale and where more innovation is needed .
Comments
Post a Comment