Skip to main content

Just In

KenGen Risks Losing Olkaria Geothermal Wells Over Licence Error

KenGen Risks Losing Olkaria Wells Over 18-Year Licence Blunder Kenya Electricity Generating Company (KenGen) faces a serious legal and operational risk at Olkaria after an error in the coordinates of its geothermal licence left part of the company’s wells, steam infrastructure and other assets outside its legally recognised area. The licensing mistake, made nearly two decades ago, remains unresolved despite the Ministry of Energy and Petroleum acknowledging the problem in 2017.  The dispute has raised questions about the security of KenGen’s investments, the government’s management of geothermal resources and the potential consequences for Kenya’s electricity supply. Olkaria is the country’s most important geothermal centre and accounts for the overwhelming majority of Kenya’s installed geothermal generation capacity.  Licence Error Exposes Strategic Assets The problem dates back to September 19, 2008, when the Ministry of Energy and Petroleum issued KenGen a licence covering ...

MB Centuary sells a drilling rig

MB Century sells Rig 32 to Webster Energy Services: what the move means for New Zealand geothermal drilling
MB Century and Webster Energy Services have agreed the sale of MB Century’s Drillmec HH350 drilling rig, Rig 32, with completion slated for December 2026 after the rig finishes its current campaign for Tūaropaki Power Company. The transaction signals a strategic shift for MB Century,moving away from direct drilling ownership toward concentrating on engineering, reservoir and technical services,while Webster Energy uses the acquisition to deepen its footprint in the New Zealand geothermal market.
This article summarises the deal, then drills into the operational, market and workforce implications for New Zealand’s geothermal sector, the strategic logic for both companies, and what the transaction suggests about capacity, competition and future drilling trends.

Deal overview and timeline

Parties: MB Century (seller) and Webster Energy Services (buyer).
- Asset: Drillmec HH350 rig known as Rig 32, a workhorse in New Zealand geothermal drilling.
- Timing: Rig 32 will complete its current Tūaropaki Power Company campaign under MB Century; ownership transfer is expected in December 2026.
- Transition commitments: Both companies say they will ensure a smooth transfer and Webster has begun engaging with the existing Rig 32 crew with the aim of retaining experienced personnel.

MB Century will remain 100% owned by Tūaropaki Trust and continue providing engineering, reservoir services, mechanical services, fabrication, machining, industrial coatings and project delivery across geothermal and other infrastructure markets in New Zealand and internationally.

Why MB Century is selling Rig 32

MB Century’s public rationale focuses on strategic realignment. The company cites three priorities,solidify, strengthen and scale—that highlight a shift from asset ownership toward service-led growth:
- Solidify: deepen customer partnerships and support client outcomes.
- Strengthen: invest in people and specialist capabilities such as reservoir and engineering services.
- Scale: leverage those capabilities to expand in targeted markets.

Operationally, divesting a major drilling asset like Rig 32 frees capital and management attention. Maintaining and operating rigs requires significant fixed costs,crewing, maintenance, logistics, and regulatory compliance,while market demand for drilling is cyclical. MB Century’s move therefore appears intended to reduce asset exposure and redeploy resources into higher-margin or more scalable engineering and technical services.
For MB Century’s customers and regional partners, the company emphasizes continuity of its broader services and its ongoing commitment to the geothermal sector despite the rig sale.

Webster Energy’s strategic rationale

For Webster Energy Services, the acquisition expands an existing 40‑plus‑year drilling footprint across geothermal, petroleum and specialist drilling. Buying Rig 32 gives Webster:
- Immediate increase in geothermal drilling capacity in New Zealand.
- A platform with proven reliability and reputation in the local market.
- An opportunity to retain and onboard experienced Rig 32 personnel, preserving institutional knowledge.
- Cross-discipline development opportunities for Webster staff across geothermal, petroleum and specialised drilling sectors.
For a company pursuing growth in geothermal, an asset acquisition offers faster market entry than building or importing new rigs, particularly given lead times for procurement and mobilization.
## Rig 32 in context: asset capability and role
Rig 32 is a Drillmec HH350 class rig. While public specifications vary by rig configuration and time-in-service upgrades, rigs in this class typically offer:
- High hook load capacity suitable for geothermal well depths and casings.
- Mobility and modularity to operate on New Zealand’s diverse well pads.
- Suitability for both exploration and production drilling, depending on tooling and completion equipment.
Rig 32’s long operational history in New Zealand has given it a strong reputation for safe, reliable performance,an important factor in geothermal operations where ground conditions and well integrity are technically demanding.

Market implications: capacity, competition and scheduling

New Zealand’s geothermal industry relies on a limited number of specialist rigs and crews. That concentrated supply creates sensitivity to asset movements and ownership changes.
- Capacity: The sale does not remove Rig 32 from the New Zealand fleet; Webster intends to continue running it locally. Therefore near‑term national drilling capacity remains effectively unchanged once the transition completes.
- Scheduling stability: Continuity of operations is critical. MB Century’s commitment to finish the current campaign before transfer reduces short-term scheduling risk for Tūaropaki and other projects.
- Competition: Webster’s stronger presence increases competitive tension among contractors for future geothermal contracts. Increased competition can drive improvements in pricing, service quality and innovation, but could also pressure margins for providers.
- Mobilisation and downtime risk: Any ownership change introduces mobilisation, commercial onboarding and safety-management tasks that can cause short interruptions. Both parties’ public statements emphasize a smooth transition to minimise disruption.

Workforce and skills: retention and cross-training

The most significant non-equipment asset in geothermal drilling is human capital. Experienced drill crews, rig managers and maintenance technicians are scarce globally and especially in specialised geothermal markets.
- Retention: Webster’s engagement with Rig 32 crew is a positive signal; retaining the current team preserves operational expertise and institutional memory about the rig and local geology.
- Upskilling: Webster’s note about enabling staff to work across geothermal, petroleum and specialist drilling suggests cross-training opportunities that can broaden workforce skills and career pathways.
- Labour market: Wellington‑and‑Taupō‑area labour markets for drillers, HSE professionals and specialist technicians remain tight. Continued investment in training and transfer of skills will be essential to maintain fleet availability.
- Industrial relations: Transition of employees between owners raises HR and contractual issues,seniority, continuity of service, and transfer-of-employment protections—which both companies need to manage carefully to avoid industrial disruption.
Geothermal demand drivers in New Zealand

New Zealand’s geothermal sector continues to underpin a meaningful share of baseload renewable electricity supply and has attractive prospects driven by:
- Decarbonisation targets and electrification policies that favour low‑emissions baseload generation.
- Industrial heat and direct-use opportunities for geothermal energy.
- Interest in geothermal for firming capacity to complement variable renewables and support electrification of industry.
- Potential for new greenfield projects and field expansions as resource consents, financing and technical feasibility align.
However, drilling-intensive projects are capital-intensive and phased, so rig demand tends to be episodic,peaking during exploration and early development phases and declining into production and maintenance. The flow of projects, consent timelines, and financing cycles ultimately govern drilling demand.

Financial and strategic risk considerations
For MB Century:

Financial redeployment: Selling Rig 32 frees capital for technical services growth, potentially improving returns if those services capture higher margins or more predictable revenue.
- Market exposure: Shifting to service provision reduces exposure to asset market cycles but increases competition with other engineering-service providers.

For Webster Energy:

Acquisition risk: Integrating the rig and personnel requires execution on HSE, maintenance standards and commercial relationships. Missteps can lead to downtime or reputational harm.
- Demand risk: Webster must secure a pipeline of work to justify the acquisition cost and operating expense of the rig during low-demand periods.
For the sector:
- Concentration risk: With few rigs nationally, the health of a single rig or operator can disproportionately affect project timelines.

Implications for project developers and owners

Project developers and owners benefit from the continuity of Rig 32’s availability in market and Webster’s stated local commitment. Specific implications:
- Scheduling confidence: If Webster maintains the rig and crew, developers face less risk of long mobilisations or re-mobilisation costs.
- Competitive tendering: Additional contractor capacity may improve tender outcomes on price and timetable.
- Contracting flexibility: Developers might negotiate multi-rig or multi-year frameworks as contractors expand services to retain utilisation and manage seasonality.

Environmental, health and safety (EHS) considerations

Geothermal drilling carries unique EHS risks—high temperatures, corrosive fluids, hydrogen sulfide and complex wellbore conditions. Maintaining high EHS standards during ownership transition is vital.
- Regulatory compliance: Ensuring continuous compliance with local health and safety and environmental regulations during transfer is essential to avoid incidents and fines.
- HSE culture: Webster should adopt and reinforce Rig 32’s existing safety culture while aligning it with Webster’s systems.
- Asset lifecycle integrity: Proper maintenance and inspection during and after ownership change protects long-term asset value and safety.

What this signals about wider industry trends

Service concentration: MB Century’s pivot toward engineering and technical services mirrors a broader industry trend where firms specialise either in asset ownership/operational drilling or in higher‑value engineering, reservoir and technical services.
- Fleet optimisation: Contractors are rationalising fleets, choosing to buy or sell rigs depending on market cycles, balance-sheet priorities and strategic focus.
- Skill diversification: Operators and contractors increasingly value cross-disciplinary skills,combining geothermal and petroleum drilling expertise,giving companies flexibility across energy projects.

Potential follow-ups to watch

Rig 32’s rebranding and operational start date under Webster Energy Services.
- Any announcements about MB Century reallocating capital into specific engineering or reservoir projects or partnerships.
- Contract wins or tender activity where Webster bids using Rig 32.
- Workforce transition details,any collective agreements, redundancies, or retraining programs.
- Shifts in rig utilisation rates across New Zealand’s fleet,especially if other rigs enter or exit service.

Conclusion

The sale of Rig 32 from MB Century to Webster Energy Services is a pragmatic realignment for both companies: MB Century refocuses on engineering and technical services while Webster expands its geothermal drilling capability in New Zealand. Because the rig will continue operating locally and Webster aims to retain the crew, near‑term drilling capacity and project schedules should remain stable. The transaction also reflects broader market dynamics,specialisation, fleet rationalisation, and competition for scarce skilled crews,that will shape how New Zealand meets its future geothermal development needs.

Would you like this edited into a version with SEO headings, meta description and suggested tags for publication on Alphaxioms?


For developers, contractors and investors, the key outcomes to monitor are the smoothness of the operational handover, Webster’s commercial success in winning subsequent campaigns with Rig 32, and MB Century’s effectiveness in scaling its service-led business. Each will be an indicator of how adaptable New Zealand’s geothermal supply chain is to the cyclical and capital‑intensive nature of drilling.

Source : MB Century 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jicarilla Apache Geothermal Study Wins $2.5 Million Grant

Jicarilla Apache Nation Launches $2.5 Million Geothermal Feasibility Study The Jicarilla Apache Nation in northern New Mexico has launched a major investigation into its geothermal energy potential after receiving a $2.5 million grant from the State of New Mexico. The funding will support a detailed feasibility study examining whether underground heat resources on tribal lands could be developed for electricity generation, direct heating, or other energy applications. The initiative represents an important step in the Nation’s efforts to understand and diversify its energy resources. Although the Jicarilla Apache Nation has not yet committed to building a geothermal facility, the study could provide the geological, technical, and economic information required for future investment decisions. The project is particularly significant because the Nation already has extensive experience with subsurface exploration through its oil and gas activities. Existing geological records, drilling inf...

Vercana Electric Rig Advances Geothermal Brine Lithium Extraction Economics

Electric-Rig Direct Lithium Extraction From Geothermal Brine: The Economics of Vercana Versus Ormat Vulcan Energy Resources is pursuing an integrated model that combines geothermal drilling, direct lithium extraction, renewable electricity and industrial heat. Through its Vercana subsidiary, the company is also using electric drilling equipment designed to support the development of its Lionheart project in Germany’s Upper Rhine Valley. The approach differs from the conventional geothermal model represented by Ormat Technologies, whose core business remains geothermal power generation, equipment, project development and energy storage rather than commercial lithium recovery from geothermal brine.  The economic question is broader than whether an electric drilling rig costs less to operate than a diesel rig. The more important issue is whether electric drilling, geothermal energy and direct lithium extraction can create a more valuable integrated project than a conventional geotherm...

Billionaire Families Bet on Advanced Geothermal Energy Investments

Billionaire Geothermal Families Bet on Geothermal Billionaire families and private investment offices are placing increasingly large bets on geothermal energy, especially on technologies designed to make the resource available in more locations. Their investments are helping finance enhanced geothermal systems, advanced drilling, closed-loop designs, and other approaches that could transform geothermal from a regionally concentrated power source into a globally scalable clean-energy industry. The investment surge reflects a broader change in the energy market. Electricity demand is rising because of artificial intelligence, data centers, industrial electrification, electric vehicles, and the expansion of digital infrastructure. At the same time, utilities and large corporations need power that is reliable around the clock. Solar and wind remain essential to the clean-energy transition, but their output varies with weather and time of day. Geothermal could complement these technologies ...

Next-Gen Geothermal Funding 2026: VCs, Banks, Government Capital

Who Is Really Funding Next-Gen Geothermal in 2026? Next-generation geothermal has moved beyond laboratory research into a capital-intensive commercialization phase. In 2026, the most important financing is no longer coming from one investor category: venture capital funds are financing drilling, subsurface modelling and hardware; strategic energy companies are providing equipment, project access and market credibility; banks are beginning to lend against contracted projects; and governments are absorbing exploration and first-of-a-kind technology risk. The strongest financing activity is concentrated in the United States and Canada, but Europe is becoming increasingly important through Germany-based deployment, European Union grants, UK innovation support, and strategic participation from European energy companies. The central investment question is changing from “Can this technology work?” to “Can the developer deliver repeatable, financeable projects at commercial cost?” The 2026 fun...

Global Geothermal Investment 2026: 15 High-Growth Markets

Global Geothermal Investment 2026: 15 Markets Where Developers Should Look Next Geothermal energy is entering its most investable decade yet, with developers, drilling contractors, turbine suppliers and private capital providers scanning a widening map of opportunities beyond the traditional “big five” producers.  This article profiles 15 markets where project pipelines, policy signals, resource quality and technology readiness converge to create compelling entry points in 2026 and beyond.  Why 2026 Is a Turning Point for Geothermal Capital Global geothermal investment is accelerating as governments seek firm, low‑carbon baseload to back up variable wind and solar, while advanced drilling and subsurface engineering lower costs and expand the resource base. Market analysts project the geothermal energy market to reach roughly USD 13.56 billion by 2030, up from about USD 9.81 billion in 2025, implying sustained double‑digit growth in development spend. Capital is flowing not onl...

Ijen vs Zanskar: Blind Geothermal Energy Discovery and Development

Ijen’s Blind Geothermal System vs. Zanskar’s AI-Discovered Resources: Two Models for Finding Hidden Heat The geothermal industry is entering a new phase in which the most valuable resources may no longer be the fields marked by obvious hot springs, geysers, fumaroles, or steaming ground. Increasingly, developers are targeting “blind” or hidden geothermal systems,reservoirs that lack clear surface expressions but can still contain the temperature, permeability, and fluid needed for commercial power generation. Two examples illustrate how different parts of the industry are approaching this challenge. In Indonesia, the Blawan-Ijen geothermal field in East Java was developed through geological interpretation, magnetotelluric imaging, conceptual modelling, and drilling. The project is now operating commercially, with its first phase delivering approximately 35 MW to the Java grid under a 30-year power purchase agreement.  In the United States, Zanskar Geothermal & Minerals is using...

Western Geothermal Power Transmission Roadmap Toward 2030

Geothermal Power in the Western United States: A Transmission and Planning Roadmap to 2030 Introduction The Western United States is approaching a decisive period for geothermal power. Electricity demand is rising because of data centers, industrial electrification, population growth, electric vehicles and the replacement of retiring fossil-fuel generation. At the same time, utilities are under growing pressure to add clean resources that can operate reliably when solar and wind output declines. Geothermal power is well positioned to fill this role. Unlike weather-dependent generation, geothermal plants can provide firm electricity for long periods, support grid reliability and reduce the amount of storage required in deeply decarbonized power systems. However, the industry’s expansion will depend on more than subsurface heat and drilling technology. By 2030, transmission access, resource planning, project finance, permitting and utility procurement will determine whether geothermal be...

Alberta Geothermal Startup Phase Secures Funding for High-Temperature Drilling Sensors

Alberta’s Phase Targets a Critical Geothermal Drilling Barrier With High-Temperature Sensors Alberta is using its deep oil-and-gas expertise to pursue a new opportunity beneath the surface: geothermal energy. Among the companies receiving support through Emissions Reduction Alberta’s Drilling Technology Challenge is Edmonton-based Phase Advanced Sensor Systems Corp., which is developing a high-temperature downhole pressure sensor for enhanced geothermal systems. The project addresses a problem that could determine whether deep geothermal energy becomes commercially viable: operators need reliable, accurate information from wells exposed to extreme heat and pressure. Phase plans to demonstrate a sensor capable of operating at temperatures above 200°C, with testing planned at 200°C, 250°C and 275°C.  The project has a total value of approximately C$1.57 million, including C$420,000 in ERA funding, according to Alberta’s project information.  Dealroom reported the award as approx...

Unlocking Impermeable Geothermal Reservoirs: Hydraulic Stimulation, Menengai and Olkaria

Unlocking the Impermeable Reservoir: Lessons from a 30-Year Reservoir Engineer An Alphaxioms interview with Richard Joseph Holt, Principal Consultant in Reservoir Engineering at RESPEC . Context: Menengai East and Olkaria Central. Every geothermal developer knows the moment.  The rig is gone and the money is spent. The well is drilled to depth, the temperature is there, and then the well will not flow. The heat is real, but the connection between the well and the reservoir is not. Wells like this sit at the centre of one of the most important questions in geothermal development: what do you do with a tight reservoir? Walk away and drill again, or find a way to unlock what is already there? To explore the question, Alphaxioms spoke with Richard Joseph Holt, Principal Consultant in Reservoir Engineering at RESPEC . Richard brings 30 years of global experience in geothermal energy.  We framed our questions around two settings, Menengai East and Olkaria Central, and asked him how ...

Kaishan Targets 2 GW Kenya Geothermal Development Across Five Fields

Kaishan Targets 2 GW of Geothermal Development Across Kenya Kenya's geothermal sector has opened a potentially significant new chapter after Kaishan Group and the Geothermal Development Company (GDC) signed a collaboration framework agreement covering five geothermal blocks in the East African Rift Valley. Signed in Nairobi on September 14, 2026 , the agreement establishes a framework for the two parties to explore potential joint development of Silali, Paka, Korosi, Baringo and Suswa . According to Kaishan, the five areas have potential to support approximately 2 GW of installed geothermal capacity . The headline figure is substantial, but it is important to distinguish between resource potential and committed generation capacity . The framework agreement is non-binding. The parties will first conduct due diligence, assess the resources and negotiate development plans before potentially signing separate binding agreements for individual geothermal blocks. The development coul...