Skip to main content

Just In

Europe Geothermal Energy Investment Opportunities, Companies, Resources, and Market Outlook

Investment Opportunities in Europe’s Geothermal Energy Market: Country-by-Country Resources, Companies, Challenges, and Growth Prospects Europe is developing one of the world’s most diverse geothermal investment markets. The continent combines mature geothermal electricity industries in Italy, Iceland, and Türkiye with rapidly expanding district-heating markets in France, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Hungary, Denmark, and Switzerland. The most attractive European opportunities are not limited to power generation. Investors can participate in geothermal district heating and cooling, industrial heat, geothermal heat pumps, enhanced geothermal systems, closed-loop systems, thermal storage, lithium extraction, drilling services, equipment manufacturing, and integrated energy networks. The European Geothermal Energy Council reported that ten new geothermal district-heating and cooling systems began operation during 2025, adding approximately 70 MWth of capacity. New systems were report...

Exclusive Interview: An In-Depth Look at Exergy’s Game-Changing Gemini Turbine

Exclusive interview with Exergy: discover the new Gemini dual-flow radial outflow turbine, the first single-unit ORC solution for 30–60 MW geothermal projects, offering up to 30 % lower costs and 99 % availability.
By: Robert Buluma.  

An interview with Luca Pozzoni - Deputy CEO | Group CFO - Exergy International and the Exergy Team

1. Can you walk us through the key design innovations in your new Gemini turbine and how it differs from previous models?

The major innovation of the Gemini turbine lies in the dual-flow configuration: unlike conventional radial outflow turbines which are equipped with a single bladed overhung rotor disk, the Gemini features a double-side bladed rotor disk mounted in a between-bearing configuration. This enables the efficient processing of significantly larger volumes of fluid, leading to higher power output having basically two radial outflow turbines in a single machine with enhanced operational stability and simplified maintenance.

2. What operating conditions and working fluids enable the performance metrics you’ve announced for the Gemini turbine?

The optimal operating conditions for the Gemini Turbine are medium enthalpy drop with large amount of resource, which means high volumetric flow rate. Generally, these conditions are reachable with different hydrocarbons, but also refrigerants are sometimes used for these applications.

3. How do you handle variable geothermal conditions, such as fluctuating temperatures or two-phase flows, in the ORC cycle?

Exergy is specialized in supplying tailor-made plants to maximize the power output based on the available resource, whatever it is full brine, full steam or brine and steam applications. The flexibility of the plant in operation is ensured by the centralized control system, which manages the control valves and the machines optimizing the plant operation based on the actual resource and ambient conditions within the safety limits.
In addition, the Radial Outflow turbine ensures stable efficiency even in off-design conditions.
With this approach, the efficiency of the plant can be always maximized.

4. What measures have you taken to ensure turbine durability, reliability, and minimal maintenance requirements?

Exergy portfolio is now composed by around 60 plants and almost 600MW of capacity, most of which are under maintenance agreements: this allowed us to develop a deep understanding of our equipment, giving us a robust base for new projects requirements.
That is one of the reason why we are proud to claim an availability greater than 99% for our plants.

5. How does the Gemini turbine scale in terms of modularity, and what size of geothermal resource can it now efficiently serve?

In terms of modularity, the Gemini Turbine can be scaled depending on the operating conditions. The size that it can efficiently serve is in the 30-60 MW range, but it has the space to increase even more.

6. How does the cost per MWh and overall economic profile of the Gemini turbine compared to your previous ORC models and competing technologies?

Compared to a standard parallel configuration, the Gemini solution offers up to a 30% reduction in turbine costs. Additionally, it simplifies the overall plant layout, reduces the total footprint, and leads to potential cost savings in plant construction. For instance, the use of a single generator contributes to these savings. These advantages hold true even when compared to competing technologies.

7. How do you ensure environmental sustainability in your ORC plants, including water use and reinjection of geothermal fluids?

ORC plants are environmentally friendly as they work through a closed-loop system that fully reinjects geothermal fluids back into the reservoir, thereby preventing any atmospheric emissions. Additionally, by employing air-cooled condensing systems, we can eliminate the need for water consumption entirely. Geothermal power plants also offer the smallest land footprint for energy produced among renewable energy sources. For example, while solar photovoltaic requires approximately 16.08 km²/TWh and wind 9.21 km²/TWh, ORC geothermal plants stand out with just 0.20 km²/TWh (source: TEHA – Ambrosetti).

8. Do you have pilot or test installations planned for the Gemini turbine, and how will performance be validated before full-scale deployment? 

We are currently evaluating more than five applications with our customers where the Gemini can be the best solution. Since the technology behind the Gemini is well known for us, being conceptually identical to our consolidated aerodynamic design, the same references of the standard ROT can be applied also to the Gemini.

9.Beyond Gemini, what are Exergy’s next R&D priorities or innovations in ORC technology?

Our R&D priorities will focus, on the one hand, on continuing to improve the efficiency and competitiveness of our ORC solutions, both in cycle design and turbomachinery. It’s important to note that Exergy has a dedicated department fully committed to the continuous enhancement of our proprietary technology. On the other hand, Exergy we are investing in the development of new clean energy technologies by leveraging our know-how and experience. In line with this strategy, last year we launched the Exergy X-Heat® series of industrial heat pumps, , designed for applications in the industrial sector, and in geothermal field, for district heating projects.

10.How do you see ORC technology evolving in the next 5–10 years, particularly for geothermal and industrial waste heat applications?

ORC technology has established itself as the preferred solution for geothermal development over the past decade, thanks to its sustainability, flexibility, and efficiency in harnessing low- to medium-high enthalpy geothermal resources. Over the next 5–10 years, we expect this growth trajectory to continue, with increasing opportunities for power generation in regions such as North America, East Africa, and Asia-Pacific, as well as for geothermal heating applications in Europe.

For industrial waste heat recovery, the adoption of ORC technology will be more context-driven. Project development in WHR is strongly influenced by government incentives - today completely absent in many markets - supportive regulatory frameworks, and electricity prices, which remain key drivers for investment within the industrial sector.

11. What markets or regions do you see as the most strategic for deploying Gemini turbines, and how do you address adoption barriers?
There is no single most strategic market for deploying Gemini turbines; rather, any project requiring large-scale geothermal power generation with an output from 25-30 MW up can benefit from the advantages offered by a single high-capacity Gemini unit. The technology is particularly well-suited to next generation Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) and Advanced Geothermal Systems (AGS), where scale and efficiency are critical.
We do not see significant barriers to adoption, as Gemini is based on the proven Radial Outflow Turbine design, with over 500 MWe already installed globally. It delivers multiple benefits, including cost reductions, a smaller footprint, and performance equivalent to multiple smaller units—all within a reliable and well-established technological framework.

12. How does Exergy balance technological innovation, profitability, and sustainable development in emerging geothermal markets?

Exergy balances technological innovation, profitability, and sustainable development by adopting an integrated approach that starts with the design of its plants and extends to business models. On one hand, we continuously invest in research and development to improve the efficiency of ORC cycles, focusing on reducing operating costs to make geothermal plant development competitive. On the other hand, we have also developed modular and flexible solutions that enable greater bankability of projects and faster implementation, facilitating the start of operations and the profitability of investments.
At the same time, sustainability remains a fundamental pillar: our plants operate in a closed loop, fully reinject geothermal fluids, and can be combined with air-cooled condensation systems to avoid water use. This allows us to offer technologies that not only generate economic value but also support responsible energy growth, respectful of the environment and aligned with the ecological transition goals of the countries where we operate.


As a guarantee of our high standards of quality and sustainability, our company has adopted an Integrated Management System compliant with UNI EN ISO 9001:2015, UNI EN ISO 14001:2015, and UNI ISO 45001:2018.  


Connect with us:LinkedInX



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

TAQA Geothermal and Strataphy Collaborates To Advance Saudi Arabia Geothermal Cooling

PrimeLoop and the Geothermal Cooling Revolution in Saudi Arabia Image: Pictorial Views Saudi Arabia is entering a new phase in cooling technology, and geothermal cooling is becoming one of the most compelling solutions in that transition. At the center of this shift is PrimeLoop, Strataphy’s proprietary geothermal cooling system, which is being positioned as a commercial answer to one of the region’s most urgent infrastructure challenges: how to cool buildings efficiently in extreme heat while reducing electricity demand and water use. This matters because cooling is not a minor utility in the Gulf. It is a core operating cost, a grid stability issue, and an environmental pressure point all at once. In a country where ambient temperatures can push conventional air-conditioning systems to their limits, the search for smarter cooling is no longer theoretical. It is now a commercial necessity. PrimeLoop is interesting because it does not simply improve on conventional cooling. It rethinks...

University of Aberdeen and RGU partner to accelerate geothermal heating deployment

University of Aberdeen and RGU join forces to accelerate geothermal energy research and heat-network deployment Image: Lucy Leiper, Director of Research, Innovation & Enterprise at the University of Aberdeen and Christina Laing, Business Development Manager at Robert Gordon University The University of Aberdeen and Robert Gordon University (RGU) have signed a Memorandum of Agreement to explore collaborative research, training and commercial activity in geothermal energy and low-carbon heating. This strategic partnership aims to combine subsurface expertise, drilling and modelling capabilities, supply-chain development, and skills training to accelerate geothermal deployment and support the just transition to net-zero heating across Scotland and beyond. Why this partnership matters for the geothermal sector Geothermal heat offers a predictable, baseload source of low-carbon thermal energy that can decarbonise district heating, industry process heat and building heating demand. Scotl...

Eavor Kleefeld II Permit Boosts Hannover Geothermal Expansion and Deep Heat Development

Eavor Secures Kleefeld II: A New Milestone for Hannover’s Deep Geothermal Ambitions Image: A Thematic image of The Eavor Project at Geretsried  Eavor’s new Kleefeld II permit marks an important step forward for deep geothermal development in Hannover, reinforcing the city’s position as one of Germany’s most closely watched urban heat-transition markets . The licence covers about 64.5 square kilometers, lasts for three years, and combines the former Buchholz and Kleefeld I exploration areas into a single, larger field that Eavor already controlled. The decision is more than an administrative update. It signals continued confidence in geothermal as a practical, scalable source of district heating in a dense metropolitan region. For Hannover, it also strengthens a project that has been building momentum for several years and could become a reference case for other European cities seeking cleaner, locally produced heat. A New Chapter For Hannover Kleefeld II sits in the northeast of...

Geothermal Steam Output Gap, Decline, Integrity, and Life Extension

The Disparity Between Anticipated and Actual Geothermal Steam Output Image: thematic image of the Hellisheiði geothermal power plant in Iceland  Geothermal energy is one of the most dependable baseload renewables, but the gap between expected steam output and real production remains a central industry problem. Exploration models are always incomplete, and once wells are onstream, pressure decline, scaling, corrosion, and thermal breakthrough steadily erode performance. Why Forecasts Miss the Mark Exploration depends on sparse wells, surface manifestations, geophysical surveys, and geochemical indicators, so it only samples a small part of a complex reservoir. Reservoirs are rarely uniform, and permeability, porosity, mineralogy, and thermal conductivity can vary sharply over short distances, which means early temperature or chemistry readings can overstate how much of the reservoir will actually support long-term production. Phase behavior adds another layer of uncertainty. In two-...

Texas Deep Geopressured Geothermal Permit Advances Long-Duration Energy Storage, Binary Power, and Grid Firming

Texas Issues Second Deep Geopressured Geothermal Permit, What it Means for U.S. Geothermal Development The Texas Railroad Commission (RRC) issued its second permit for a deep geopressured geothermal well in July 2026, approving Quidnet Energy Deployment LLC to drill a geothermal energy storage well in Galveston County. This permit follows the RRC’s first deep geopressured authorization in February 2025 for Sage Geosystems in Atascosa County. Together, these approvals mark a meaningful step in Texas’s pivot from traditional fossil-fuel regulation toward enabling novel subsurface energy technologies, leveraging decades of oil and gas oversight to manage drilling, completion, and subsurface engineering risks. This article explains geopressured geothermal fundamentals, why Texas matters, technical and environmental considerations, market and policy implications, and what to watch next for developers and stakeholders. What is Deep Geopressured Geothermal? Deep geopressured geothermal syste...

XGS Energy IPO: Morgan Stanley, Geothermal Growth, and Fervo’s Market Momentum

XGS Energy Weighs IPO After Hiring Morgan Stanley, Chasing Fervo's Geothermal Momentum Geothermal developer XGS Energy has hired Morgan Stanley to evaluate an initial public offering, positioning itself as a potential second geothermal IPO of 2026 after Fervo Energy's blockbuster listing. The move underscores growing investor appetite for clean, firm power technologies as data-center demand and grid reliability concerns reshape the energy investment landscape. The Scoop: Morgan Stanley, IPO Timing, and Market Context In early July 2026, Axios Pro reported that XGS Energy engaged Morgan Stanley to assess a public listing, with company leadership potentially deciding within about a month whether to proceed. The timing is strategic: Fervo Energy's May 2026 IPO created a rare "open window" for geothermal equities, providing valuation benchmarks and investor education that earlier private rounds lacked. For investors, the narrative is straightforward. If Fervo proved t...

The Economics of 10 MW, 50 MW, and 100 MW Geothermal Plants

The Economics of 10 MW, 50 MW, and 100 MW Geothermal Plants Image: A thematic image of a geothermal power plant  Geothermal power has a simple promise and a complicated price tag. It turns heat from deep underground into steady electricity, but the money goes out long before the power comes in, because exploration, drilling, plant construction, and grid connection all happen up front. That is why plant size matters so much. In general, 10 MW projects tend to be the most expensive per kilowatt, 50 MW projects usually strike a better balance, and 100 MW plants can be the most efficient on a cost per electricity basis if the reservoir is strong enough. Why geothermal costs so much upfront The economics of geothermal are driven by risk and scale. A developer has to locate the resource, confirm temperature and flow, drill wells, build surface facilities, and connect everything to the grid before a single dollar of revenue is earned. That makes geothermal very different from technologies...

Who Finances Next-Generation Geothermal Projects? Key Investors and Funding Trends

Who Is Financing the Next Generation of Geothermal Projects? Image : A thematic image of a geothermal power plant  The next generation of geothermal projects is being financed by a wide mix of venture capital firms, strategic corporate investors, commercial banks, institutional funds, and project finance lenders. The financing landscape is changing quickly because geothermal is moving from a niche clean-energy option into a serious infrastructure asset class with the potential to deliver reliable, 24/7 power at scale. Why geothermal finance is changing For years, geothermal struggled to attract large pools of capital because many projects were seen as technically risky, geographically limited, and difficult to scale. That perception is shifting as advanced geothermal technologies, especially enhanced geothermal systems, expand the number of places where geothermal can work. Investors now see a larger addressable market, stronger power demand, and better alignment with the needs of...

Kaishan and Halliburton Boost Geothermal EGS, Green Hydrogen, and Green Ammonia Projects

Kaishan , Halliburton Team Up on Advanced Geothermal, Green Fuel Projects Kaishan Group and Halliburton have deepened their cooperation with a strategic memorandum of understanding centered on advanced geothermal development, especially enhanced geothermal systems (EGS), along with green hydrogen and green ammonia opportunities. The deal builds on earlier Indonesia drilling work and signals a broader push to combine Halliburton’s high-end well-construction capabilities with Kaishan’s geothermal equipment and project-development platform. Partnership Background The relationship did not begin with the July 2026 memorandum. In February 2026, Halliburton said it had won a multiyear contract from KS Orka Renewables , part of Kaishan’s wider corporate group, to support geothermal well construction at the PT Sorik Marapi Geothermal Power and PT Sokoria Geothermal Indonesia projects in Indonesia. That work covered directional drilling, cementing, drilling fluids, and drill bits across several...

Geothermal EPC Companies: How Developers Choose the Right Contractor for Projects

Geothermal EPC Companies: How Developers Choose a Contractor Image: A Thematic image of a geothermal power plant  Geothermal developers choose EPC contractors by combining technical geothermal experience, financial strength, execution credibility, and the ability to manage field-specific risk. In recent awards, the strongest bidders have been those with proven geothermal references, repeat-delivery history, and the ability to package engineering, procurement, construction, and commissioning into one bankable offer . Why geothermal EPC is different Geothermal EPC is more complex than standard power plant construction because the contractor must build around a live underground resource. That means the project team has to deal with reservoir uncertainty, steam chemistry, scaling, corrosion, reinjection behavior, plant-field interfaces, and grid interconnection all at once . For developers, this turns EPC selection into a risk-management decision. The contractor is not just a builder; ...